T
This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Subscribe
here
to receive similar updates directly in your inbox.
In a significant move on Friday, the Senate took measures to avert a government shutdown, effectively ceding its spending authority to President Donald Trump and relegating Congress to a mere advisory role. This decision has ignited frustration among Democrats, marking a considerable retreat for the party.
Much of the discontent is directed towards Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, who had stated just a day earlier that the fight was over and it was time to move ahead. The dilemma was clear: either maintain a limited government operation or face a complete shutdown, and the outcome has made a strong statement.
However, this outcome has not left party members feeling satisfied.
When asked whether it was time for new leadership among Senate Democrats, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries did not express support for Schumer, responding bluntly, “Next question.” Conversations have emerged in various circles about potentially challenging Schumer in the 2028 primary.
On that Friday, nine Senate Democrats, along with Independent Angus King of Maine, joined nearly all Senate Republicans to prevent a government shutdown. The temporary spending bill provides the White House with increased authority to shut down numerous federal programs and eliminate thousands of jobs. Consequently, Congress, at least until September 30, is effectively granting the executive branch considerable freedom regarding fund allocation.
This decision marked a disappointing conclusion to a challenging week for Democrats. Amidst the chaotic developments from the Trump administration—including new executive orders, personnel shifts, and tariffs—they were also grappling with the imminent threat of a government shutdown. House Republicans pushed through a spending plan that many Democrats found particularly objectionable due to its cuts impacting the District of Columbia. Following this, the House adjourned, leaving the Senate without the opportunity to amend the budget. Schumer initially asserted that the proposed framework lacked adequate support, only to reverse his stance the next day and endorse the spending plan to avoid a shutdown.
The sudden transition from a potential shutdown to a compromise further fueled the dissatisfaction many Democrats felt towards their leadership.
“Whatever happens will happen,” stated Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, who voted against the plan and used the moments leading up to the vote to express a sense of bleak acceptance.
This atmosphere of resignation has been evident in Washington in recent weeks. The discord among various anti-Trump factions has diminished as Trump’s assertive control over the budgetary process has appeared increasingly inevitable. The victorious atmosphere in the White House, combined with the distractions surrounding its pet-project DOGE, has only heightened the frustrations of Democrats striving to protect the integrity of federal operations.
Ultimately, Democrats with the capacity to challenge Trump and his Republican allies conceded. While the GOP controls both the House and Senate, as well as the presidency, Senate rules require 60 votes to initiate proceedings, and Republicans secured only 52 affirmative votes in the Upper Chamber. This necessitated that GOP lawmakers enlist eight Democratic votes to proceed.
Senate Democrats assessed the numbers, polling data, and their own capabilities. They concluded that their desire to oppose Trump’s expansive authority did not align with their ability to do so effectively. Political analysts often emphasize that true power lies where will meets capacity. Democrats had the power to initiate a government shutdown but lacked the means to convincingly assign blame to Republicans or present a unified strategy for reopening the government under more favorable terms.
The pressing question now is how Democrats navigate the situation surrounding Schumer. While there is currently a notable silence, murmurs of discontent are rising regarding Schumer’s future as Minority Leader for the remainder of this term. Both progressive factions and the broader party base are apprehensive about this decision, and guiding the party through the turbulent waters leading up to 2026 is no small undertaking.
To clarify: Schumer’s position is not in immediate jeopardy, and Democrats are not inclined to engage in a self-destructive power struggle similar to their House counterparts. Schumer makes decisions based on strategic calculations rather than impulsive reactions. His agreement to prioritize keeping the government operational at the cost of legislative authority arose from a rational assessment rather than recklessness. Nevertheless, this choice carries consequences, particularly regarding his standing among discontented Democrats who expect the opposition party to actively challenge an administration intent on undermining a government it clearly disdains.
For now, the government continues to function. However, the Democrats’ ability to counter Trump is noticeably diminished. Until Congress re-evaluates its position, the legislative branch remains subordinate to the executive.
Stay updated on critical developments in Washington.
Subscribe to the D.C. Brief newsletter
.
